linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin control and GPIO rework
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 12:03:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130107030310.GA14865@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1799593.QvyAVKI32y@avalon>

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Sunday 30 December 2012 09:12:02 Simon Horman wrote:
> > [ CC: linux-arm-kernel, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann ]
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > > 
> > > Here's the fourth version of the SH pin control and GPIO rework patches.
> > > The patches have been rebased on top of v3.8-rc1 but are otherwise
> > > unchanged.
> > > 
> > > The series starts with the same additional platform-specific fixes as v3
> > > (patches 4 to 7), I would appreciate if someone could review them
> > > carefully.
> > > 
> > > You can get the series from my git tree at
> > > 
> > >         git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git pinmux
> > > 
> > > I would like to push this set to v3.9 independently of the later rework
> > > and OF-related sets. Simon, can you take it in your tree ?
> > 
> > Sure.
> > 
> > One inconvenience of my tree is that it goes via the arm-soc tree and as
> > such things need to be split out into branches. I believe in the case of
> > this series the patches will need to be split across soc, board and pfc
> > branches. The branches may be based on each other.
> > 
> > Do you think the following scheme might work:
> > 
> > Patches 1 - 7: sh-soc
> > Patches 8 - 21: pfc, based on sh-soc
> > Patches 22 - 29: soc (ARM SoC), based on pfc
> > Patches 30 - 42: sh-soc2, based on pfc
> > Patches 43 - 50: pfc2, based on a merge of soc and sh-soc2
> > Patches 51 - 54: soc2 (ARM SoC), based on pfc2
> > Patches 55 - 66: pfc3, based on soc2
> > Patches 67 - 78: sh-soc3, based on pfc3
> > Patches 79 - 81: pfc4, based on sh-soc3
> 
> That looks good to me. Alternatively you could base pfc3 on top of a merge of 
> soc and sh-soc2, and base pfc4 on top of a merge of soc2 and sh-soc3, but you 
> might get conflicts in Kconfig and Makefile (they should be trivial to solve 
> though).

Thanks, I have used the modified scheme that you describe above and all
seems well. In detail, I have done the following:

Patches 1 - 7: sh-soc based on v3.8-rc1
Patches 8 - 21: pfc, based on sh-soc
Patches 22 - 29: soc (ARM SoC), based on pfc
Patches 30 - 42: sh-soc2, based on pfc
Patches 43 - 50 and 55 - 66: pfc2, based on a merge of soc and sh-soc2
Patches 51 - 54: soc2 (ARM SoC), based on pfc2
Patches 67 - 78: sh-soc3, based on pfc2
Patches 79 - 81: pfc4, based on a merge of soc2 and sh-soc-3

Assuming that nothing nasty crops I plan to push the result to
the renesas tree later today.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-07  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1356735303-29474-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
2012-12-30  0:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin control and GPIO rework Simon Horman
2013-01-03 16:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-07  3:03     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-01-07 19:33       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-08  1:32         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130107030310.GA14865@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).