* Question:add
@ 2013-01-11 10:24 Steve zhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Steve zhan @ 2013-01-11 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
All:
I have find that arm gic driver have not register irq_disable
method, as below:
static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
.name = "GIC",
.irq_mask = gic_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = gic_unmask_irq,
.irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq,
.irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
.irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.irq_set_affinity = gic_set_affinity,
#endif
.irq_set_wake = gic_set_wake,
};
Question is:
When some drivers want to disable irq, maybe it will call
linux standard inerface: irq_disable() that defined in include\
linux\interrupt.h, this function will call
void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) {
desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
irq_state_set_masked(desc);
}
}
Because gic have not register irq_diable method, so the interrupt can
not disable immediately, it is enable until the interrupt come next time,
then disalbed by mask because irq_state_set_disable(desc);
I have checked irq_enable method:
void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
irq_state_clr_disabled(desc);
if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable)
desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable(&desc->irq_data);
else
desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
}
This method have do unmask when irq_enable method is not exist.
Is it a good idea to add irq_mask call in irq_disable()?
Regards,
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-01-11 10:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-11 10:24 Question:add Steve zhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).