From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 06/11] arm: arch_timer: factor out register accessors
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:31:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130111143101.GC19765@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F01456.3030001@ti.com>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:32:06PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2013 09:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently the arch_timer register accessors are thrown together with
> > the main driver, preventing us from porting the driver to other
> > architectures.
> >
> > This patch moves the register accessors into a header file, as with
> > the arm64 version. Constants required by the accessors are also moved.
> >
> > Additionally isbs are added in arch_timer_get_cnt{v,p}ct to prevent
> > the cpu from speculating the reads and returning stale values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 92 ---------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > index d40229d..701f2b7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > @@ -1,13 +1,114 @@
> > #ifndef __ASMARM_ARCH_TIMER_H
> > #define __ASMARM_ARCH_TIMER_H
> >
> > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > #include <asm/errno.h>
> > +
> > #include <linux/clocksource.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> > int arch_timer_of_register(void);
> > int arch_timer_sched_clock_init(void);
> > struct timecounter *arch_timer_get_timecounter(void);
> > +
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE (1 << 0)
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_MASK (1 << 1)
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT (1 << 2)
> > +
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL 0
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL 1
> > +
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS 0
> > +#define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS 1
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * These register accessors are marked inline so the compiler can
> > + * nicely work out which register we want, and chuck away the rest of
> > + * the code. At least it does so with a recent GCC (4.6.3).
> > + */
> > +static inline void arch_timer_reg_write(const int access, const int reg, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + if (access == ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS) {
> > + switch (reg) {
> > + case ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL:
> > + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c2, 1" : : "r" (val));
> > + break;
> > + case ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL:
> > + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c2, 0" : : "r" (val));
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (access == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS) {
> > + switch (reg) {
> > + case ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL:
> > + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c3, 1" : : "r" (val));
> > + break;
> > + case ARCH_TIMER_REG_TVAL:
> > + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c3, 0" : : "r" (val));
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + isb();
> > +}
> The isb() additions is actually a sepoerate fix. I suggest you to split
> the subject patch into 1) Movement of header data 2) isb() additions.
>
> Feel free to add my ack on updated patches if you agree.
Thanks, will do.
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
>
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-11 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 16:07 [PATCHv3 00/11] Unify arm_generic and arch_timer drivers Mark Rutland
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 01/11] arm: arch_timer: balance device_node refcounting Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 02/11] arm: arch_timer: remove redundant available check Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 14:07 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 03/11] arm: arch_timer: use u64/u32 for register data Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:19 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 04/11] arm: arch_timer: standardise counter reading Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-15 10:25 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-15 10:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 05/11] arm: arch_timer: split cntfrq accessor Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 06/11] arm: arch_timer: factor out register accessors Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 14:31 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 07/11] arm: arch_timer: divorce from local_timer api Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 16:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-11 16:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 08/11] arm: arch_timer: add arch_counter_set_user_access Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:40 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 14:54 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 15:07 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11 17:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-11 16:57 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 17:54 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 09/11] arm: arch_timer: move core to drivers/clocksource Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 15:04 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 10/11] arm64: move from arm_generic to arm_arch_timer Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-09 16:07 ` [PATCHv2 11/11] Documentation: Add ARMv8 to arch_timer devicetree Mark Rutland
2013-01-11 13:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-19 15:10 [PATCHv2 00/11] Unify arm_generic and arch_timer drivers Mark Rutland
2012-12-19 15:11 ` [PATCHv2 06/11] arm: arch_timer: factor out register accessors Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130111143101.GC19765@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).