* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div @ 2012-12-03 8:14 Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-04 1:32 ` Haojian Zhuang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-03 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with unsigned long. So use do_div instead. Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> --- drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c index a489985..1ef271e 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate) { struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); + unsigned long long int rate; - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; + do_div(rate, fix->div); + return (unsigned long)rate; } static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, -- 1.7.10.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-03 8:14 [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-04 1:32 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 16:41 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 16:42 ` Haojian Zhuang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-04 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult > > The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with > unsigned long. So use do_div instead. > > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > index a489985..1ef271e 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > unsigned long parent_rate) > { > struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); > + unsigned long long int rate; > > - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; > + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; > + do_div(rate, fix->div); > + return (unsigned long)rate; > } > > static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > -- > 1.7.10.4 > Correct Mike's email address. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-04 1:32 ` Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-15 16:41 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 20:54 ` Mike Turquette 2012-12-15 16:42 ` Haojian Zhuang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-15 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult >> >> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with >> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> unsigned long parent_rate) >> { >> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); >> + unsigned long long int rate; >> >> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; >> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; >> + do_div(rate, fix->div); >> + return (unsigned long)rate; >> } >> >> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> > > Correct Mike's email address. Any comments? Does it mean that nobody want to fix the bug? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-15 16:41 ` Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-15 20:54 ` Mike Turquette 2012-12-16 6:27 ` Haojian Zhuang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-12-15 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >>> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult >>> >>> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with >>> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >>> unsigned long parent_rate) >>> { >>> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); >>> + unsigned long long int rate; >>> >>> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; >>> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; >>> + do_div(rate, fix->div); >>> + return (unsigned long)rate; >>> } >>> >>> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >>> -- >>> 1.7.10.4 >>> >> >> Correct Mike's email address. > > Any comments? Does it mean that nobody want to fix the bug? Thanks for the patch. My apologies for letting this one slip through the cracks but my normal email workflow was unavoidably disrupted and I find myself playing catch-up with pending patches. The patch looks good to me but I'll change the $SUBJECT to "clk: fixed-factor: round_rate should use do_div" and do some testing before taking it in. Regards, Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-15 20:54 ` Mike Turquette @ 2012-12-16 6:27 ` Haojian Zhuang 2013-01-12 2:45 ` Mike Turquette 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-16 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Haojian Zhuang > <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult >>>> >>>> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with >>>> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>>> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >>>> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >>>> unsigned long parent_rate) >>>> { >>>> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); >>>> + unsigned long long int rate; >>>> >>>> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; >>>> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; >>>> + do_div(rate, fix->div); >>>> + return (unsigned long)rate; >>>> } >>>> >>>> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.10.4 >>>> >>> >>> Correct Mike's email address. >> >> Any comments? Does it mean that nobody want to fix the bug? > > Thanks for the patch. My apologies for letting this one slip through > the cracks but my normal email workflow was unavoidably disrupted and > I find myself playing catch-up with pending patches. > > The patch looks good to me but I'll change the $SUBJECT to "clk: > fixed-factor: round_rate should use do_div" and do some testing before > taking it in. > > Regards, > Mike It's nice. Thank you. Best Regards Haojian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-16 6:27 ` Haojian Zhuang @ 2013-01-12 2:45 ` Mike Turquette 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mike Turquette @ 2013-01-12 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Quoting Haojian Zhuang (2012-12-15 22:27:58) > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Haojian Zhuang > > <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult > >>>> > >>>> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with > >>>> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- > >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > >>>> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c > >>>> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > >>>> unsigned long parent_rate) > >>>> { > >>>> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); > >>>> + unsigned long long int rate; > >>>> > >>>> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; > >>>> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; > >>>> + do_div(rate, fix->div); > >>>> + return (unsigned long)rate; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > >>>> -- > >>>> 1.7.10.4 > >>>> > >>> > >>> Correct Mike's email address. > >> > >> Any comments? Does it mean that nobody want to fix the bug? > > > > Thanks for the patch. My apologies for letting this one slip through > > the cracks but my normal email workflow was unavoidably disrupted and > > I find myself playing catch-up with pending patches. > > > > The patch looks good to me but I'll change the $SUBJECT to "clk: > > fixed-factor: round_rate should use do_div" and do some testing before > > taking it in. > > > > Regards, > > Mike > > It's nice. Thank you. > Pulled the fix into clk-next. Thanks for the patch, Mike > Best Regards > Haojian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div 2012-12-04 1:32 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 16:41 ` Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-15 16:42 ` Haojian Zhuang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-12-15 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote: >> clk->rate = parent->rate / div * mult >> >> The formula is OK. But it may overflow while we do operate with >> unsigned long. So use do_div instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> index a489985..1ef271e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c >> @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ static unsigned long clk_factor_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> unsigned long parent_rate) >> { >> struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw); >> + unsigned long long int rate; >> >> - return parent_rate * fix->mult / fix->div; >> + rate = (unsigned long long int)parent_rate * fix->mult; >> + do_div(rate, fix->div); >> + return (unsigned long)rate; >> } >> >> static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> > > Correct Mike's email address. Any comments? It's the bug what needs to be fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-12 2:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-03 8:14 [PATCH] clk: factor: calculate rate by do_div Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-04 1:32 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 16:41 ` Haojian Zhuang 2012-12-15 20:54 ` Mike Turquette 2012-12-16 6:27 ` Haojian Zhuang 2013-01-12 2:45 ` Mike Turquette 2012-12-15 16:42 ` Haojian Zhuang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).