From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:55:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 00/16] big.LITTLE low-level CPU and cluster power management In-Reply-To: References: <1357777251-13541-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1358157392.19304.243.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com> <1358217848.8513.14.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com> <20130116160242.GB31318@arm.com> Message-ID: <20130117175531.GD5737@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:18:39PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:44:23PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Joseph Lo wrote: > > > > So do you have a plan to make it become a generic framework in this > > > > series or later work? > > > > > > It is already generic, except for the name. In other words, you could > > > start using this code already. > > > > > > I'm still debating a good substitute for the bL_ prefix in this series > > > to give it the appearance of generic code. > > > > mc_? > > Bah. :-/ Like in multi-cluster (not "Hammer time" ;). But if they are not even cluster dependent, a simple mp_ would also do. -- Catalin