From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:04:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCHv3 0/7] Add pinctrl driver for Allwinner A1X SoCs In-Reply-To: <50F9BD09.1030107@free-electrons.com> References: <1357681398-23956-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <50F52D2E.205@free-electrons.com> <50F9BD09.1030107@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20130122070441.GA25783@quad.lixom.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:22:17PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Thanks for your review. > > On 18/01/2013 20:24, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Maxime Ripard > > > >>> Are you ok with this version or do you have additionnal comments ? > >> > >> I'm probably OK with it, I've only just now reached this point in my > >> mail backlog. > > > > As noted I had more comments, they should be quick to address. > > > > When finished, shall this be applied to the pinctrl tree or some other > > subtree, like ARM SoC? > > Maybe the easiest thing to do would be to push the pinctrl driver in > itself through your tree, and the dt additions through the arm-soc one? As long as things work without the DT pieces, that's a good way to do it for new code (conversion of existing platforms gets more complicated most of the time). -Olof