From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:37:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: Move ios_handler functionality into the driver In-Reply-To: <20130122102010.GL6857@gmail.com> References: <1355495429-12510-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1355495429-12510-3-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20130122090000.GH6857@gmail.com> <20130122100607.GH23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122102010.GL6857@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130122103723.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:53:42AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > >> From: Lee Jones > > > >> > > > >> There are currently two instances of the ios_handler being used. > > > >> Both of which mearly toy with some regulator settings. Now there > > > >> is a GPIO regulator API, we can use that instead, and lessen the > > > >> per platform burden. By doing this, we also become more Device > > > >> Tree compatible. > > > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > > > Why is this patch in your tree with Ulf as the Author? > > > > > > This is because of the way Russell's patch tracker works, it sets > > > Author: to the name of the person using the patch tracker and > > > discards the From: field in the beginning of the patch which > > > git am will conversely respect. > > > > Actually, the reverse. It does now respect the From: line, but the > > From: line will be ignored for all notifications about the patch > > because the patch system was never built to parse the actual comments > > when sending out the email notifications. > > So what do I have to do to reaffirm myself as the author? I'd need to recommit the patch with the right information, which isn't that easy to do.