From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:09:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH V2  0/5] W1: Support onewire master on i.MX53
In-Reply-To: <20130122082712.GJ1906@pengutronix.de>
References: <20130116145749.24249.678.stgit@localhost>
 <20130122082712.GJ1906@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20130122140941.GA4920@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:27:12AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:57:49PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
> > W1: Support onewire master on i.MX53
> > 	* Add device tree and pinctrl support to the MXC master driver
> > 	* Convert to use devm_
> > 	* Add i.MX53 clocks
> > 	* Add i.MX53 device tree entries
> > 
> > Changes since V1
> > * Applied comments from Sascha Hauer:
> > 	* Move patch converting driver to devm_ before the one adding devm_ based pinctrl
> > 	* Fix existing unbalanced clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
> > 	in probe error path
> > 
> > * Place DT patch last since it includes pinctrls for driver.
> 
> This looks good now.
> 
> Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> 
> You might have to send this again in two series, one for the w1
> maintainer and one for arm-soc. Both series should be sufficiently
> orthogonal.
> 
Evgeniy has already ACK-ed the v1 series, so maybe he does not see any
problem with the whole series going through one tree.  In that case,
we may just have it go via arm-soc tree?  Otherwise, please let us
know, Evgeniy.

Shawn