From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:18:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: Move ios_handler functionality into the driver In-Reply-To: <20130123101748.GO23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1355495429-12510-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1355495429-12510-3-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20130122090000.GH6857@gmail.com> <20130122100607.GH23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122102010.GL6857@gmail.com> <20130122103723.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130122105608.GP6857@gmail.com> <20130123101349.GH15873@gmail.com> <20130123101748.GO23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20130123111805.GI15873@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:13:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Are you saying that you won't do it? :) > > > > > > Is there anything I can do to make the process easier? > > > > Thinking about this a little more. Is it easier to remove it from your > > tree altogether? Only I have a small "ARM: ux500: " patch-set which > > directly relies on this patch. I could take it in via ARM-SoC without > > any fear of ordering issues. > > Thankfully, the patch doesn't conflict with any of the others I have, so > we can do that (and it's actually easier to do that.) > > Done. Brilliant, that's 2 birds with one stone. I'll queue it up for ARM-SoC. Thanks Russell. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog