From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:14:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] misc/at24: Add at24c512b eeprom support In-Reply-To: References: <1358922764-31654-1-git-send-email-Ying.Liu@freescale.com> <20130123125001.GG16264@pengutronix.de> <20130123134936.GH16264@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20130123141445.GA2758@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > The names of the two entries are not the same, one is "24c512", the > other is "24c512b". I do understand that. There are TONS of 24c512 variants out there. > My original idea to add the new entry is to count on the name > difference to do different system reset operations. Your devicetree may have both names, but at24 doesn't need it since there is no code involved handling the difference. > The commit message of the patch which adds 24c32 support for MX28EVK > tells that "mx28evk has a free slot U50 that can be used to populate > an I2C EEPROM.". I do know that, too. You can put other things there, too. But well, not worth the hazzle... -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: