From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:25:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] irqchip: gic: Perform the gic_secondary_init() call via CPU notifier In-Reply-To: <20130125043039.GN13691@verge.net.au> References: <1358963974-5496-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <1358963974-5496-5-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20130125043039.GN13691@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20130125092527.GA6619@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:30:39AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:59:34PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > All the calls to gic_secondary_init() pass 0 as the first argument. > > Since this function is called on each CPU when starting, it can be done > > in a platform-independent way via a CPU notifier registered by the GIC > > code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Russell King > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > > Cc: Kukjin Kim > > Cc: Rob Herring > > Cc: Sascha Hauer > > Cc: David Brown > > Cc: Daniel Walker > > Cc: Bryan Huntsman > > Cc: Tony Lindgren > > Cc: Simon Horman > > Cc: Magnus Damm > > Cc: Dinh Nguyen > > Cc: Viresh Kumar > > Cc: Shiraz Hashim > > Cc: Stephen Warren > > Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > mach-shmobile portion: > > Acked-by: Simon Horman > > For the record, I tested this on the kzm9g, kzm9d and marzen boards > which use the r8a7779, EMEV2 and r8a7779 SoCs respectively. Thanks. Can I add a Tested-by as well? -- Catalin