From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_pte for unaligned addresses
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:26:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201162631.GG5151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359472036-7613-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:07:16PM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
> With LPAE enabled, alloc_init_section() does not map the
> entire address space for unaligned addresses.
>
> The issue also reproduced with CMA + LPAE. CMA tries to map 16MB
> with page granularity mappings during boot. alloc_init_pte()
> is called and out of 16MB, only 2MB gets mapped and rest remains
> unaccessible.
>
> Because of this OMAP5 boot is broken with CMA + LPAE enabled.
> Fix the issue by ensuring that the entire addresses are
> mapped.
>
> Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Tested-by: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
> ---
> [V2] Moved the loop to alloc_init_pte as per Russell's
> feedback and changed the subject accordingly.
> Using PMD_XXX instead of SECTION_XXX to avoid
> different loop increments with/without LPAE.
>
> [v3] Removed the dummy variable phys and updated
> the commit log for CMA case.
>
> [v4] Resending with updated change log and
> updating the tags.
>
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index f8388ad..b94c313 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -569,11 +569,23 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long end, unsigned long pfn,
> const struct mem_type *type)
> {
> - pte_t *pte = early_pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1);
> + unsigned long next;
> + pte_t *pte;
> +
> do {
> - set_pte_ext(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, __pgprot(type->prot_pte)), 0);
> - pfn++;
> - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> + if ((end-addr) & PMD_MASK)
> + next = (addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
> + else
> + next = end;
Can use pmd_addr_end(addr, end) here?
> + pte = early_pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1);
> + do {
> + set_pte_ext(pte, pfn_pte(pfn,
> + __pgprot(type->prot_pte)), 0);
> + pfn++;
> + } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != next);
> +
> + } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
I would actually keep the loop in alloc_init_section(). There is even a
comment in there saying "no need to loop" but you actually moved the
loop in alloc_init_pte().
I'm proposing a simpler patch below (only lightly tested on VE/C-A9).
The only difference is that we do more flush_pmd_entry() calls but I'm
not really bothered, it's during boot and you won't notice.
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 9c82f98..eaa8ba8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ static inline pte_t *pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
#define pte_present_user(pte) (pte_present(pte) && (pte_val(pte) & L_PTE_USER))
+#define section_addr_end(addr, end) \
+({ unsigned long __boundary = ((addr) + SECTION_SIZE) & SECTION_MASK; \
+ (__boundary - 1 < (end) - 1)? __boundary: (end); \
+})
+
#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6
static inline void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval)
{
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 9f06102..0d0faed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -581,34 +581,19 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
const struct mem_type *type)
{
pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
+ unsigned long next;
- /*
- * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be aligned
- * to a section boundary. Note that PMDs refer to the individual
- * L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1 entries making
- * up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
- */
- if (type->prot_sect && ((addr | end | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
- pmd_t *p = pmd;
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
- if (addr & SECTION_SIZE)
- pmd++;
-#endif
-
- do {
+ do {
+ next = section_addr_end(addr, end);
+ /* try section mapping first */
+ if (((addr | next | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
*pmd = __pmd(phys | type->prot_sect);
- phys += SECTION_SIZE;
- } while (pmd++, addr += SECTION_SIZE, addr != end);
-
- flush_pmd_entry(p);
- } else {
- /*
- * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
- * individual L1 entries.
- */
- alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
- }
+ flush_pmd_entry(pmd);
+ } else {
+ alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
+ }
+ phys += next - addr;
+ } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
}
static void __init alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 15:07 [PATCH v4] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_pte for unaligned addresses R Sricharan
2013-02-01 6:21 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-01 16:26 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-02-01 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-01 16:40 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 17:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-01 18:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-04 4:40 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-04 4:44 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-04 11:10 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-06 12:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 13:59 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 13:56 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 15:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 15:25 ` R Sricharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130201162631.GG5151@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).