From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_pte for unaligned addresses
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:42:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201174246.GJ5151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANOGCgMbzEWpJQE8PH2nS9_wa0DP_14E4=whGgKxWGJ_HpwomQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:40:35PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:32:54PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Catalin Marinas
> >> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> >> > @@ -581,34 +581,19 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >> > const struct mem_type *type)
> >> > {
> >> > pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> >> > + unsigned long next;
> >> >
> >> > - /*
> >> > - * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be aligned
> >> > - * to a section boundary. Note that PMDs refer to the individual
> >> > - * L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1 entries making
> >> > - * up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
> >> > - */
> >> > - if (type->prot_sect && ((addr | end | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
> >> > - pmd_t *p = pmd;
> >> > -
> >> > -#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
> >> > - if (addr & SECTION_SIZE)
> >> > - pmd++;
> >> > -#endif
> >> > -
> >> > - do {
> >> > + do {
> >> > + next = section_addr_end(addr, end);
> >> > + /* try section mapping first */
> >> > + if (((addr | next | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
> >> > *pmd = __pmd(phys | type->prot_sect);
> >> > - phys += SECTION_SIZE;
> >> > - } while (pmd++, addr += SECTION_SIZE, addr != end);
> >> > -
> >> > - flush_pmd_entry(p);
> >> > - } else {
> >> > - /*
> >> > - * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
> >> > - * individual L1 entries.
> >> > - */
> >> > - alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> >> > - }
> >> > + flush_pmd_entry(pmd);
> >> > + } else {
> >> > + alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> >>
> >> aren't you wasting memory here? The pte doesn't alloc a full page, but
> >> the memblock allocator allocates a full page right?
> >>
> >> I thought this was the rationale behind Russell's previous comments on
> >> Santosh's earlier patch version.
> >
> > You are right, it's allocating more ptes. Than we can use pmd_addr_end.
> > I'll go back to the code.
> >
> don't get me wrong, I strongly prefer keeping that loop in
> alloc_init_section, the other way it was weird to read, felt like
> shoehorning something, but you may have to keep a pointer around for
> unused part of a page for pte or something, not sure what ends up
> being nicest.
Another try. This time I kept the same logic as before but added a loop
on the outside (and indented the code). With classic MMU
pmd_addr_end(addr, end) always return end, so the logic doesn't change.
With LPAE we should get the standard looping over pmd entries. Again,
only tested on C-A9.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 9f06102..47154f3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -581,34 +581,36 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
const struct mem_type *type)
{
pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
+ unsigned long next;
- /*
- * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be aligned
- * to a section boundary. Note that PMDs refer to the individual
- * L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1 entries making
- * up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
- */
- if (type->prot_sect && ((addr | end | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
- pmd_t *p = pmd;
+ do {
+ next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
+
+ /*
+ * Try a section mapping - next, addr and phys must all be
+ * aligned to a section boundary. Note that PMDs refer to the
+ * individual L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1
+ * entries making up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
+ */
+ if (((addr | next | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
+ pmd_t *p = pmd;
#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
- if (addr & SECTION_SIZE)
- pmd++;
+ if (addr & SECTION_SIZE)
+ pmd++;
#endif
+ do {
+ *pmd = __pmd(phys | type->prot_sect);
+ phys += SECTION_SIZE;
+ } while (pmd++, addr += SECTION_SIZE, addr != next);
- do {
- *pmd = __pmd(phys | type->prot_sect);
- phys += SECTION_SIZE;
- } while (pmd++, addr += SECTION_SIZE, addr != end);
-
- flush_pmd_entry(p);
- } else {
- /*
- * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
- * individual L1 entries.
- */
- alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
- }
+ flush_pmd_entry(p);
+ } else {
+ alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
+ phys += next - addr;
+ pmd++;
+ }
+ } while (addr = next, addr != end);
}
static void __init alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 15:07 [PATCH v4] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_pte for unaligned addresses R Sricharan
2013-02-01 6:21 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-01 16:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-01 16:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-01 16:40 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 17:42 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-02-01 18:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-04 4:40 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-04 4:44 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-04 11:10 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-06 12:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 13:59 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 13:56 ` R Sricharan
2013-02-06 15:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-06 15:25 ` R Sricharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130201174246.GJ5151@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).