From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:31:21 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] ux500 DT related fixes and platform enhancements In-Reply-To: References: <20130131115552.GG5301@gmail.com> <20130206135911.GB7519@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130208083121.GG7519@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I can do that. The reason I was submitting myself was due to the massive > > amount of ux500 DT patches I was pushing. Now that's stopped, I'm happy for > > Linus to handle it all. > > OK so what about I pull this branch into my ux500 git and > call it a devicetree branch, and then we can optionally > merge a few of those ARM: ux500: * patches that > was sent for the regulator stuff on top of that as well? There are two reasons why I don't like that idea: 1) As Olof pointed out, a lot of these patches aren't actually DT related, and 2) I really want all of the regulator stuff to stay together. Each of the changes in the platform code are directly dependent on the ones happening in the regulator driver, and visa versa. It would be best if they continued to be taken though Marks tree. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog