From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Export the CPU logical map to modules
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:33:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130208113308.GA1973@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1302071457070.6300@xanadu.home>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:05:03PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone have a comment on this?
>
> As you say, I'd be tempted to export some accessor with well defined
> semantic meaning instead.
I think I agree...
Modules definitely shouldn't easily be able to write cpu_logical_map.
I'll rework something and repost.
Cheers
---Dave
>
>
>
> >
> > Cheers
> > ---Dave
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:34:04PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > It is reasonable for loadable modules to be CPU topology aware
> > > (particular examples include cpufreq and cpuidle drivers).
> > >
> > > This patch exports __cpu_logical_map, so that modules can use the
> > > cpu_logical_map() interface declared in <asm/smp_plat.h>.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > If anyone has a strong view on whether this should be
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), I don't have a problem with changing
> > > that. I'm not sure of the precise etiquette here.
> > > Certainly this does not feel like a very "public" interface.
> > >
> > > Perhaps we should wrap this in a real function for export
> > > to modules, rather than encouraging them to poke the
> > > __cpu_logical_map[] array (albeit via a predefined macro).
> > >
> > >
> > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > index 3f6cbb2..1b9e5bf 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ void cpu_init(void)
> > > }
> > >
> > > int __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_logical_map);
> > >
> > > void __init smp_setup_processor_id(void)
> > > {
> > > --
> > > 1.7.4.1
> > >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 17:34 [RFC PATCH] ARM: Export the CPU logical map to modules Dave Martin
2013-02-07 12:22 ` Dave Martin
2013-02-07 20:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-08 11:33 ` Dave Martin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130208113308.GA1973@linaro.org \
--to=dave.martin@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).