From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:00:33 -0800 Subject: Latest additional build warnings In-Reply-To: <20130209114918.GJ17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130205142218.GB17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130209114918.GJ17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20130210030032.GC4801@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [130209 03:53]: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:22:18PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'omap_postcore_initcall' > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:122: warning: 'hwspinlocks_init' defined but not used > > I'm still seeing the above in the build of Friday's merge. I'm also > seeing additional warnings in the randconfig similar to the above for > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-iommu.c. Thanks for letting me know about the omap-iommu.c one. Looks like there's also one patch for drm.c. Olof, if you did not yet apply the hwspinlock.c warning fix, I'll just do a branch with all three of them for you. Regards, Tony