linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] arm: fix memset-related crashes caused by recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:41:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130211184114.GP9801@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359793988-6881-1-git-send-email-ivan.djelic@parrot.com>

On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:33:08AM +0000, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> Recent GCC versions (e.g. GCC-4.7.2) perform optimizations based on
> assumptions about the implementation of memset and similar functions.
> The current ARM optimized memset code does not return the value of
> its first argument, as is usually expected from standard implementations.

How does GCC do this? By strcmping the function name and assuming that
memset is a libc implementation?

If so, maybe passing something like -ffreestanding would make sense to turn
this behaviour off in the compiler (otherwise we should also vet the rest of
the standard string functions).

Will

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-02  8:33 [PATCH] [RFC] arm: fix memset-related crashes caused by recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations Ivan Djelic
2013-02-09 11:05 ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-09 14:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-11 12:35   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-11 18:17 ` Ben Dooks
2013-02-11 21:39   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-11 18:41 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-02-11 19:42   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-12 14:00     ` Will Deacon
2013-02-12 15:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 16:36         ` Will Deacon
2013-02-12 16:37           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 16:38             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 13:50           ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06  1:42             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-06  7:05               ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06 17:11             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-06 17:38               ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06 18:43                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130211184114.GP9801@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).