linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:52:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130211185221.GR4801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130211170616.73fd9fd30bb10c27a698ad4d@canb.auug.org.au>

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [130210 22:11]:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c between commit 8a89e93237e1 ("mfd:
> omap-usb-host: Consolidate OMAP USB-HS platform data") from the mfd tree
> and commit c1d1cd597fc7 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: remove obsolete
> pm_lats and early_device code") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Thanks again.

Samuel, up to you, but I suggest you just drop these patches for
now if still possible unless other patches are based on these.

All OMAP USB people, doing these things should be pretty trivial,
just follow these steps:

1. Do all the platform data and header changes first so we can
   put them into a shared minimal topic branch either in the
   USB tree or arm-soc tree

2. Modify the USB driver(s) based on #1 and have them merged into
   the USB tree

3. Add new arch/arm related pdata and .dts entries based on #1
   so we can merge it via arm-soc tree

4. Remove all the old crap later on to avoid extra dependencies
   between these branches

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11  6:06 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11 18:52 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-02-11 19:08   ` Olof Johansson
2013-02-12 14:46   ` Roger Quadros
2013-02-12 14:53     ` Samuel Ortiz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-28  6:01 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-21  5:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-21  5:59 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-02-04  6:04 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-01  5:34 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-01 22:56 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17  3:34 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130211185221.GR4801@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).