linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Add Device Tree support
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:06:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212110645.GC826@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3641123.j8hijCHc7L@flatron>

Hi Tomasz,

[...]

> > > +Required properties:
> > > +- compatible : should be one of following:
> > > +    samsung,s3c24xx-pwm-timer - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx
> > > +    samsung,s3c64xx-pwm-timer - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx
> > > and newer +- reg: base address and size of register area
> > > +- interrupts: interrupt list for all five PWM timers.
> > 
> > Is this a set of combined interrupts, or one per timer?
> 
> It is one per timer, however the node represents a single PWM timer block 
> that contains several timers (usually 5).
> 
> > Which order are they in?
> > 
> > Assuming they're one per timer, in order, how about something like:
> > 
> > "- interrupts: one interrupt per timer, starting at timer 0".
> 
> Sounds fine to me. I will modify the description in next version.

Great.

> > > +- samsung,source-timer: index of timer to be used as clocksource
> > > +- samsung,event-timer: index of timer to be used as clock event
> > 
> > Is there any reason this needs to be specified in the dt?
> 
> Yes. On some SoCs selected channels of PWM block can be used as PWM 
> outputs and so thsoe cannot be used for system timers. This property makes 
> it possible to specify channels used as system timers on particular 
> platform (board).
> 
> > Can the driver not just select two arbitrary timers from the hardware?
> 
> In most cases I could statically choose channel 3 and 4 as it was done 
> before my patches on S3C24xx and S3C64xx. I can make those channels 
> default if others are not specified in properties.

That would be nice, it would mean we could have some less verbose dts :)

[...]

> > > -	timer_base = ioremap_nocache(timer_variant.reg_base, SZ_4K);
> > > -	if (!timer_base)
> > > -		panic("failed to map timer registers");
> > > +	if (!timer_base) {
> > > +		timer_base = ioremap_nocache(timer_variant.reg_base, SZ_4K);
> > > +		if (!timer_base)
> > > +			panic("failed to map timer registers");
> > > +	}
> > 
> > You map 4K here, but the binding didn't mention that 4K is always the
> > expected size of the reg.
> 
> This is a compatibility mapping for legacy (non-DT) platforms that will be 
> removed once all platforms get moved to DT.

Sounds reasonable.

[...]

> > > +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,source-timer", &val))
> > > +		panic("no samsung,source-timer property provided");
> > > +	if (val > ARRAY_SIZE(timer_variant.irqs))
> > > +		panic("samsung,source-timer property out of range");
> > 
> > This check doesn't tell you if you actually had an irq in the dt for the
> > timer at that index.
> 
> Hmm, this line is probably a bit confusing. I will add a define with 
> maximum number of channels and use it here. This is only a check whether 
> the index given is not out of range.

Ok.

> > Do you really need to panic here? Can you not just warn?
> > 
> > What if a future platform has another timer driver that can at least get
> > the board to boot?
> 
> It's rather unlikely that new platforms using samsung-time will show up. 
> This clocksource is used only for non-SMP platforms based on S3C and S5P 
> SoCs, where it is the only possible supported clocksource.

Ok.

[...]

> > > +	if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,divisor", &val)) {
> > > +		if (val > 16 || (1 << (fls(val) - 1)) != val)
> > > +			panic("divsor must be 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16");
> > > +		timer_variant.divisor = timer_variant.prescale * val;
> > 
> > Maybe it's just me, but I find this somewhat difficult to read.
> > 
> > How about something like:
> > 
> > switch (val) {
> > case 1:
> > case 2:
> > case 4:
> > case 8:
> > case 16:
> > 	timer_variant.divisor = timer_variant.prescale * val;
> > 	break;
> > default:
> > 	warn("no divisor specified");
> > };
> 
> It looks better indeed. I will change this part in next version.

Great.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-10 13:20 [PATCH 00/12] ARM: samsung-time: Prepare for multiplatform support Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] ARM: SAMSUNG: Move samsung-time to drivers/clocksource Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Set platform-specific parameters at runtime Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Drop useless defines from public header Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Move samsung-time.h header to include/linux Tomasz Figa
2013-02-11 10:36   ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-11 23:32     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Use local register definitions Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Remove use of static register mapping Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Use clk_get_sys for getting clocks Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] ARM: SAMSUNG: devs: Drop unnecessary IRQ resources of timer devices Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Do not use static IRQ definition Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Move IRQ mask/ack handling to the driver Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 11/12] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove unused PWM timer IRQ chip code Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 13:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] clocksource: samsung-time: Add Device Tree support Tomasz Figa
2013-02-11 11:00   ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-11 23:46     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-02-12 11:06       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-02-10 13:32 ` [PATCH 00/12] ARM: samsung-time: Prepare for multiplatform support Tomasz Figa
2013-02-10 14:12   ` Kyungmin Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130212110645.GC826@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).