* Building DRM for i.MX fails with linux-next 20130212
@ 2013-02-12 17:50 Fabio Estevam
2013-02-12 21:20 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2013-02-12 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
Building imx_v6_v7_defconfig on linux-next 20130212 gives me the
following build error:
CC drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.o
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c: In function ?drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask?:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:485:2: error: implicit declaration of
function ?pcie_capability_read_dword?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Then I tried to fix it as follows:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
index 6f58c81..6a08165 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ drm-y := drm_auth.o drm_buffer.o drm_bufs.o drm_cache.o \
drm_context.o drm_dma.o \
drm_drv.o drm_fops.o drm_gem.o drm_ioctl.o drm_irq.o \
drm_lock.o drm_memory.o drm_proc.o drm_stub.o drm_vm.o \
- drm_agpsupport.o drm_scatter.o drm_pci.o \
+ drm_agpsupport.o drm_scatter.o \
drm_platform.o drm_sysfs.o drm_hashtab.o drm_mm.o \
drm_crtc.o drm_modes.o drm_edid.o \
drm_info.o drm_debugfs.o drm_encoder_slave.o \
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ drm-y := drm_auth.o drm_buffer.o
drm_bufs.o drm_cache.o \
drm-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += drm_ioc32.o
drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_GEM_CMA_HELPER) += drm_gem_cma_helper.o
-drm-$(CONFIG_PCI) += ati_pcigart.o
+drm-$(CONFIG_PCI) += ati_pcigart.o drm_pci.o
drm-usb-y := drm_usb.o
,which caused another issue:
GEN .version
CHK include/generated/compile.h
UPD include/generated/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_rmmap_locked':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x4f370): undefined reference to `__drm_pci_free'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_addmap_core':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x4f4f4): undefined reference to `drm_pci_alloc'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_cleanup_buf_error':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x4f920): undefined reference to `drm_pci_free'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_addbufs_pci':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x4fc00): undefined reference to `drm_pci_alloc'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_dma_takedown':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x51c84): undefined reference to `drm_pci_free'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `drm_vm_shm_close':
clk-vexpress-osc.c:(.text+0x57d60): undefined reference to `__drm_pci_free'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Building DRM for i.MX fails with linux-next 20130212
2013-02-12 17:50 Building DRM for i.MX fails with linux-next 20130212 Fabio Estevam
@ 2013-02-12 21:20 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-02-12 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2013-02-12 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Dave/Bjorn,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Building imx_v6_v7_defconfig on linux-next 20130212 gives me the
> following build error:
>
> CC drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c: In function ?drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask?:
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:485:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function ?pcie_capability_read_dword?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
,and it is caused by commit:
commit dd66cc2e1f4765d0e6f39eb1e7d8d64d3f1cc522
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: Fri Jan 4 19:10:42 2013 +0000
drm/pci: Use PCI Express Capability accessors
Use PCI Express Capability access functions to simplify this code a bit.
For non-PCIe devices or pre-PCIe 3.0 devices that don't implement the Link
Capabilities 2 register, pcie_capability_read_dword() reads a zero.
Since we're only testing whether the bits we care about are set, there's no
need to mask out the other bits we *don't* care about.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The patch below fixes the build on imx_v6_v7_defconfig (which has
CONFIG_PCI unselected):
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
index 86102a0..93ec85d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ void drm_pci_exit(struct drm_driver *driver,
struct pci_driver *pdriver)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_exit);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
int drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *mask)
{
struct pci_dev *root;
@@ -503,3 +504,4 @@ int drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask(struct drm_device
*dev, u32 *mask)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask);
+#endif
If this looks good I can submit it formally.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Building DRM for i.MX fails with linux-next 20130212
2013-02-12 21:20 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2013-02-12 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-02-12 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:20:30PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Dave/Bjorn,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Building imx_v6_v7_defconfig on linux-next 20130212 gives me the
> > following build error:
> >
> > CC drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.o
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c: In function ?drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask?:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c:485:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > function ?pcie_capability_read_dword?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> ,and it is caused by commit:
>
> commit dd66cc2e1f4765d0e6f39eb1e7d8d64d3f1cc522
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Date: Fri Jan 4 19:10:42 2013 +0000
>
> drm/pci: Use PCI Express Capability accessors
I sent Dave the patch below last Friday. It's essentially the same
as yours, Fabio.
commit ed0708e69f71fab656afc1c891f3c54c9b105664
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: Fri Feb 8 15:18:35 2013 -0700
drm/pci: define drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask() only when CONFIG_PCI=y
Move drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask() under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI because it
it used only for PCI devices (evergreen, r600, r770), and it uses
PCI interfaces that only exist when CONFIG_PCI=y.
Previously, we tried to compile drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask() even when
CONFIG_PCI=n, which fails.
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
index 754bc96..2b818c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
@@ -439,33 +439,6 @@ int drm_pci_init(struct drm_driver *driver, struct pci_driver *pdriver)
return 0;
}
-#else
-
-int drm_pci_init(struct drm_driver *driver, struct pci_driver *pdriver)
-{
- return -1;
-}
-
-#endif
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_init);
-
-/*@}*/
-void drm_pci_exit(struct drm_driver *driver, struct pci_driver *pdriver)
-{
- struct drm_device *dev, *tmp;
- DRM_DEBUG("\n");
-
- if (driver->driver_features & DRIVER_MODESET) {
- pci_unregister_driver(pdriver);
- } else {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &driver->device_list, driver_item)
- drm_put_dev(dev);
- }
- DRM_INFO("Module unloaded\n");
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_exit);
-
int drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *mask)
{
struct pci_dev *root;
@@ -514,3 +487,30 @@ int drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *mask)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask);
+
+#else
+
+int drm_pci_init(struct drm_driver *driver, struct pci_driver *pdriver)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_init);
+
+/*@}*/
+void drm_pci_exit(struct drm_driver *driver, struct pci_driver *pdriver)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev, *tmp;
+ DRM_DEBUG("\n");
+
+ if (driver->driver_features & DRIVER_MODESET) {
+ pci_unregister_driver(pdriver);
+ } else {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &driver->device_list, driver_item)
+ drm_put_dev(dev);
+ }
+ DRM_INFO("Module unloaded\n");
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_exit);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-12 21:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-12 17:50 Building DRM for i.MX fails with linux-next 20130212 Fabio Estevam
2013-02-12 21:20 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-02-12 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).