From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:12:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214181217.GA11806@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130214175650.GA25891@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [130214 10:00]:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:12:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [130214 03:19]:
> > > Currently the omap-serial driver will not
> > > work properly if booted via DT with CPUIDLE
> > > enabled because it depends on function pointers
> > > provided by hwmod to change its own SYSCONFIG
> > > register.
> > >
> > > Remove that relyance on hwmod by moving SYSCONFIG
> > > handling to driver itself. Note that this also
> > > fixes a possible corner case bug where we could
> > > be putting UART in Force Idle mode if we called
> > > omap_serial_enable_wakeup(up, false) after setting
> > > NOIDLE to the idle mode. This is because hwmod
> > > has no protection against that situation.
>
> Any comments to these last two sentences ?
Well I think all the driver handling should be done in
the driver since we now have runtime PM.
> > I agree the sysconfig stuff should be handled in the drivers.
> > But considering that we need to also reset or idle hardware
> > that may not have a driver loaded, it's best to put the
> > reset/idle function in to the driver specific header as
> > an inline function.
>
> that is likely to cause quite a few isues, don't you think?
>
> hwmod depending on driver code to reset particular IPs ? Seems like we
> need a generic device_reset() hook which can be called by platform code,
> no ? Not sure if that would help a lot though.
>
> > This way the hwmod code can idle or reset the unclaimed
> > hardware in a late_initcall.
>
> The problem with this:
>
> my_driver.h:
>
> static inline void my_driver_reset(struct my_driver *drv)
> {
> writel(drv->regs, SYSS, RESET);
> }
>
> how will hwmod provide drv pointer ? Even if we use void __iomem * it
> would mean that hwmod would have to a) access driver's ioremaped area or
> b) ioremap() the same area again.
Well the ioremapping should only be done in the driver ideally.
Currently we have a mess of both hwmod and driver doing the
ioremapping.
So in the long run, let's assume only the driver ioremaps for
most of the cases where there is a driver available.
And only in the case there is no driver, hwmod can parse the address
space from DT for the unclaimed hardware in the late_initcall.
So the shared inline function should just take the __iomem * and
size instead of *drv so both the driver and hwmod code can tinker
with the autoidle bit.
> Note sure if any of those are acceptable.
Hmm what issues do you see in the above suggestion?
> > And probably the handling of sysconfig bits should be
> > done using a common header in include/linux/omap-hwmod.h
> > or something so it can be shared between drivers.
>
> That could be done, though I think the header name could be different.
> Maybe it could match the document which define those registers, let me
> just check if we're allowed to use that publicly :-p
Cool yeah I have no preference where that header should be. Maybe
something bus specific like include/linux/bus/omap-hwmod.h?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 11:15 [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 17:57 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <1360840554-26901-2-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
2013-02-14 17:12 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 17:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 18:12 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-02-14 19:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 19:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 20:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 21:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 15:30 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 15:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 19:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 19:43 ` hwmod data duplication (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 10:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 21:56 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-19 15:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 16:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 16:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 19:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 20:10 ` OMAP reset requirements (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency)^[:x Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 20:25 ` OMAP reset requirements Kevin Hilman
2013-02-20 6:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 6:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-20 17:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 19:16 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-20 20:03 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-21 10:16 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-21 12:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-15 10:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 13:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 16:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 6:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 8:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 9:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 15:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-16 5:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 5:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-16 5:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 8:08 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-18 8:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 15:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 4:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 14:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 15:28 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:04 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214181217.GA11806@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).