From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: omap: add include guard for soc.h
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:55:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214225526.GH11362@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360882071-4072668-5-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [130214 14:51]:
> Commit e4c060db "ARM: OMAP: Split plat/cpu.h into local soc.h for
> mach-omap1 and mach-omap2" moved the bulk of "plat/cpu.h" into "cpu.h"
> but did not add an include guard for the new file that was present
> in the old one. There are cases where the file is indeed included
> multiple times, probably by accident, but adding the include
> guard ensures that this has no further consequences.
>
> Without this patch, building allmodconfig results in lots of warnings like:
>
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/drm.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h:206:0: warning: "cpu_is_omap24xx" redefined [enabled by default]
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/drm.c:28:0:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h:227:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/drm.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h:207:0: warning: "cpu_is_omap242x" redefined [enabled by default]
I left it out intentionally as these are private to mach-omap2,
and I'd like to simplify the indirect includes there further.
So I'd rather just remove the duplicate soc.h from drm.c.
If people really think this should be applied, I have no
objections to this patch naturally.
Regards,
Tony
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h
> index c62116b..97dd373 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/soc.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> *
> */
> +#ifndef OMAP2_SOC_H
> +#define OMAP2_SOC_H
>
> #include "omap24xx.h"
> #include "omap34xx.h"
> @@ -497,3 +499,4 @@ level(__##fn);
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> +#endif
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 22:47 [PATCH 0/9] arm-soc/for-next allyesconfig build regressions Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: arch_timer: include linux/errno.h Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-15 18:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: imx: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 needs REGULATOR_WM8350 Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 17:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: omap2: include linux/errno.h in hwmod_reset Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:58 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: omap: add include guard for soc.h Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:55 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-02-14 23:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 12:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm: export drm_vm_open_locked Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 6/9] net: cwdavinci_cpdma: export symbols for cpsw Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:52 ` David Miller
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 7/9] remoteproc: omap: depend on OMAP_MBOX_FWK Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:56 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 8/9] [HACK] ARM: imx: work around v7_cpu_resume link error Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 23:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-15 11:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 11:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 11:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-16 5:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-18 5:55 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-18 17:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-19 1:42 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-19 4:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-19 5:10 ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-14 22:47 ` [PATCH 9/9] [media] davinci: do not include mach/hardware.h Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 22:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 5:06 ` Prabhakar Lad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214225526.GH11362@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).