From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:16:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215101610.GR17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1302141946110.11016@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:47:53PM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Regarding ioremap(), it seems reasonable for drivers to call ioremap(), as
> long as the implementation of ioremap() can be overridden by the device's
> bus. PCI device drivers already do this -- albeit in a PCI-specific way
> -- with pci_ioremap_bar():
Err no, that's just a helper to assist checking the resource type and
remove all those pesky resource size mistakes - see the commit text:
PCI: introduce an pci_ioremap(pdev, barnr) function
A common thing in many PCI drivers is to ioremap() an entire bar. This
is a slightly fragile thing right now, needing both an address and a
size, and many driver writers do.. various things there.
This patch introduces an pci_ioremap() function taking just a PCI device
struct and the bar number as arguments, and figures this all out itself,
in one place. In addition, we can add various sanity checks to this
function (the patch already checks to make sure that the bar in question
really is a MEM bar; few to no drivers do that sort of thing).
Hopefully with this type of API we get less chance of mistakes in
drivers with ioremap() operations.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> So instead of something bus-specific like that, a better way would be to
> use something like:
>
> va = dev->bus->ioremap( ... );
> va = dev->bus->iounmap( ... );
No. ioremap() is already generic. We don't need additional layers of
indirection per bus type.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 11:15 [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 17:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 15:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:04 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <1360840554-26901-2-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
2013-02-14 17:12 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 17:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 18:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 19:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 19:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 20:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 21:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 15:30 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 15:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 19:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 19:43 ` hwmod data duplication (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 10:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 21:56 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-19 15:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 16:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 16:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 19:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 20:10 ` OMAP reset requirements (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency)^[:x Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 20:25 ` OMAP reset requirements Kevin Hilman
2013-02-20 6:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 6:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-20 17:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 19:16 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-20 20:03 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-21 10:16 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-21 12:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-15 10:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-02-15 13:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 13:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 16:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 6:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 8:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 9:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 15:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-16 5:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 5:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-16 5:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 8:08 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-18 8:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 15:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 4:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 14:52 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130215101610.GR17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).