From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:06:46 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 09/12] pinctrl: generic: add auto pull config parameter In-Reply-To: References: <1360602659-4774-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> <1360602659-4774-10-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> <20130215163755.GB5724@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20130215210645.GC5724@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Linus Walleij [130215 12:58]: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Linus Walleij [130215 00:58]: > >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Haojian Zhuang > >> wrote: > >> > >> > There's only one bit to control pin bias as enabled or disabled for some > >> > pins in OMAP SoC. So append PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_AUTO_PULL for this case. > >> > User shouldn't switch pin state between AUTO_PULL and PULL_UP/PULL_DOWN, > >> > since they're similiar concepts. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang > >> > >> Makes perfect sense. > >> Patch applied with Tony's ACK! > > > > Sorry the conclusion was that this probably won't be needed and can > > probably be done with just PULL_UP/PULL_DOWN. > > > > So can you please drop or revert this AUTO_PULL one? > > Sorry I was drunk or something. > > I never applied this patch, I applied the other one, > with the title "pinctrl: generic: rename input schmitt disable". > > This one stays out. OK thanks for clarifying it :) Tony