From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:42:56 -0800 Subject: [patch 1/2] kcmp: Make it to depend on CONFIG_KCMP In-Reply-To: <20130219182838.GL20312@moon> References: <20130219064800.719149796@openvz.org> <20130219065210.030802820@openvz.org> <5123444D.6000806@suse.cz> <20130219093154.GF20312@moon> <5123BC2B.6000304@zytor.com> <20130219182838.GL20312@moon> Message-ID: <20130219134256.f4cedf44.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:28:38 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Since kcmp syscall has been implemented (initially on > x86 architecture) a number of other archs wire it up > as well: xtensa, sparc, sh, s390, mips, microblaze, > m68k (not taking into account those who uses > for syscall numbers > definitions). > > But the Makefile, which turns kcmp.o generation on > still depends on former config-x86. Thus get rid > of this limitation and make kcmp.o depend on CONFIG_KCMP > option. > > ... > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/init/Kconfig > +++ linux-2.6.git/init/Kconfig > @@ -279,6 +279,15 @@ config FHANDLE > get renamed. Enables open_by_handle_at(2) and name_to_handle_at(2) > syscalls. > > +config KCMP > + bool "kcmp syscall" > + default CHECKPOINT_RESTORE > + help > + If you say Y here, a user level program will be able to use > + kcmp(2) syscall. > + > + If unsure, say Y. > + > config AUDIT > bool "Auditing support" > depends on NET > Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/Makefile > +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile > @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ endif > obj-y += sched/ > obj-y += power/ > > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE),y) > -obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += kcmp.o > -endif > +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o > obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o This permits people to select kcmp with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n. Is there any point in doing that? What would be wrong with just doing obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o ?