From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:22:12 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] Kbuild support for ARM FIT images In-Reply-To: <5126B979.5000205@gmail.com> References: <20130221134656.GC17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <51262A7A.8040103@ti.com> <20130221182724.GA14329@obsidianresearch.com> <20130221211444.GB20114@obsidianresearch.com> <20130221231848.880DE200552@gemini.denx.de> <20130221232821.GA2823@obsidianresearch.com> <5126B979.5000205@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130222022212.GB11169@obsidianresearch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:19:05PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > The desired FPGA use case is DT updates after booting the kernel. This > has nothing to do with FIT images. And if the FPGA tools generate the > DTB, then it is certainly not tied to the kernel. Completely unrelated, but do you have any pointer for how to do this? Hot plugging a 'dtb fragment' into the kernel would be really handy.. I'm thinking something like adding a tree below a PCI controller describing a PCI device and sub nodes, similar to what Thierry was doing for his Avionics. How would interrupt maps and phandles be managed across the main dtb and the 'hot plugged' dtb? Regards, Jason