From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:54:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130222135411.GA9202@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361540926.26780.56.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > atomic64_read() and atomic64_set() are supposed to take care
> > of that, without even the need for _inc() or _add() parts
> > that use LOCK.
>
> Are you sure? Generally atomic*_set() is not actually an
> atomic operation.
as per Documentation/atomic_ops.h:
#define atomic_read(v) ((v)->counter)
which simply reads the counter value currently visible to the
calling thread. The read is atomic in that the return value is
guaranteed to be one of the values initialized or modified with
the interface operations if a proper implicit or explicit
memory barrier is used after possible runtime initialization by
any other thread and the value is modified only with the
interface operations.
...
Properly aligned pointers, longs, ints, and chars (and unsigned
equivalents) may be atomically loaded from and stored to in the
same sense as described for atomic_read() and atomic_set().
The ACCESS_ONCE() macro should be used to prevent the compiler
from using optimizations that might otherwise optimize accesses
out of existence on the one hand, or that might create
unsolicited accesses on the other.
This is usually a side effect of M[O]ESI cache coherency
protocols - you can only get a 'split' word access if the word
crosses cache line boundaries (multiples of 32 bytes,
generally).
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 5:56 [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats Kevin Hilman
2013-02-22 5:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpustat: use accessor functions for get/set/add Kevin Hilman
2013-02-22 6:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22 7:17 ` Amit Kucheria
2013-02-22 7:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22 12:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 15:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-22 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 14:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 5:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpustat: convert to atomic operations Kevin Hilman
2013-02-22 8:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 12:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-02-22 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 14:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-22 14:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 19:01 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130222135411.GA9202@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).