From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:52:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: Add generic cpufreq driver and its DT glue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20130305105251.GL17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:52:41PM +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote: > +static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(u32 cluster) > +{ > + if (!atomic_dec_return(&cluster_usage[cluster])) { > + clk_put(clk[cluster]); > + clk[cluster] = NULL; What's the point in setting the clk to NULL? > +static int get_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(u32 cluster) > +{ > + char name[9] = "cluster"; > + int count; > + > + if (atomic_inc_return(&cluster_usage[cluster]) != 1) > + return 0; > + > + freq_table[cluster] = arm_bL_ops->get_freq_tbl(cluster, &count); > + if (!freq_table[cluster]) > + goto atomic_dec; > + > + name[7] = cluster + '0'; > + clk[cluster] = clk_get(NULL, name); > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk[cluster])) { NAK. Two reasons. 1. IS_ERR_OR_NULL. You know about this, it's been on the list several times. 2. Maybe clk_get_sys() rather than clk_get() and use a sensible device name ("cpu-cluster.%u" maybe) rather than a connection name with a NULL device?