From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 04:20:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] R-Car SATA platform data
In-Reply-To: <5137D139.9010304@cogentembedded.com>
References: <201302272332.51650.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
 <20130301072501.GE14376@verge.net.au>
 <5137D139.9010304@cogentembedded.com>
Message-ID: <20130307032055.GI9499@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:28:57AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 03/01/2013 10:25 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> >
> >>Hello.
> >>
> >>    Here's the v4 of the set of now 3 patches (the driver itself has been merged
> >>since) against the Simon Horman's renesas.git repo, 'next' branch:
> >>
> >>[1/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: SATA DT configuration
> >>[2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: add SATA support
> >>[3/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: add SATA support
> >>
> >>Patch changes since the initial posting are reported in the individual patches.
> >Thanks. I have refreshed the topic/r-car-sata branch of the renesas tree
> >accordingly. That branch still contains a copy of the "Add Renesas R-Car
> >on-chip 3Gbps SATA controller driver." but it should disappear once I rebase
> >(e.g. on v3.9-rc1).
> 
>    I see you have finally merged my patches to your 'next' branch, thanks.
> However, you've also merged Morimoto-san's patch to change from gic_spi()
> to gic_iid(), and I thought I'd recast patch 2/3 to make it use
> gic_iid() too.

Sorry for messing that up.

> How do we do now, do I need to send a new patch to convert to gic_iid()?

Yes, I think it would be best if you sent an incremental patch.

Sorry once again for the mix-up.