From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:08:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm: kirkwood: factor pinmux descriptors for
 OpenBlocks A6
In-Reply-To: <20130307062255.GH3904@lunn.ch>
References: <1362587021-32762-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1362587021-32762-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <20130306181648.GE3904@lunn.ch> <20130306201646.179fce69@skate>
 <20130307062255.GH3904@lunn.ch>
Message-ID: <20130307090813.231548e6@skate>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Andrew Lunn,

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:22:55 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > Right, that's true. I knew about this, but since the pinmux
> > configuration was made explicit for those GPIOs, I thought the original
> > author(s) of this .dts did this intentionally. For example, it somewhat
> > documents the 8 GPIOs that are available in the bottom connector of the
> > OpenBlocks A6. They are not tied to anyway particular device, so they
> > wouldn't appear anywhere in the DT. Ditto for the DIP switch GPIOs. Do
> > you also want those to be removed from the DT?
> 
> Hi Thomas
> 
> Good point. They are not required, but don't harm. So yes, leave them
> there for documentation purposes.

So I keep the GPIO muxing for the external GPIOs and the DIP switch
GPIOs, but the one that are "claimed" by another device (like gpio-leds
or gpio-keys), I should remove the muxing? I'm fine with that, just
want to confirm the choice.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com