linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/12] ASoC: dmaengine_pcm: add snd_dmaengine_generic_pcm_open()
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:43:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308074325.GB28481@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307112006.GD17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:20:06AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 05:31:23PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The bit I'm missing is why this is particularly hard to change, it
> > doesn't seem like a massive refactoring and there's not many users.

> Well, it requires the thing to be reworked along with everyone who uses
> it, specifically snd_dmaengine_pcm_open() and snd_dmaengine_pcm_close().

Oh, OK.  That doesn't seem like a big deal really - it's certainly not a
throw the thing out and start over job.  It sounded like you'd identifed
some new issue you'd not mentioned rather than just the same issue, it
wasn't clear to me that it was the same issue.

> Now, I could use your excuse that you've given me in the past: "I don't
> have much of that hardware so I can't test the changes, so I'm not going
> to touch this code evar again!"  (That's basically what you said about

I'm not particularly asking you to fix this yourself except in that it
seems like it's an important issue for you.  If anything something like
this patch ought to make things marginally easier to deal with by
factoring out a very small bit of the code.

> the AC'97 struct device stuff.)  You can't have it both ways and always
> shovel what you don't like onto other people.

I'm aware of the issue, as are the people who've worked on the code.
Speaking personally I just happen to disagree with you about the urgency
here - it's not like it's the only problem we've got and the practical
effects are limited to a subset of mostly older hardware which generally
doesn't use dmaeengine in the first place.  I imagine that a similar
thing is true for everyone else.

There's plenty of other hardware that doesn't work right now, another
pressing example I can think of is devices that subdivide an audio
interface into multiple unrelated streams of audio, you aren't alone in
having hardware that needs the frameworks improving in order to achieve
basic functionality.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130308/5ae2086b/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-05 12:23 [PATCH v2 00/12] ARM: mxs: move to generic DMA device tree binding Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ARM: dts: add generic DMA device tree binding for mxs-dma Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 19:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-06  5:10     ` Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] dma: mxs-dma: use devm_* managed functions Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] dma: mxs-dma: move to generic device tree binding Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mmc: mxs-mmc: move to use generic DMA helper Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] spi: mxs-spi: " Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] i2c: i2c-mxs: " Shawn Guo
2013-03-21 11:07   ` Wolfram Sang
2013-03-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] mtd: gpmi: " Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] serial: mxs-auart: " Shawn Guo
2013-03-06  1:36   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ASoC: dmaengine_pcm: add snd_dmaengine_generic_pcm_open() Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 14:37   ` [PATCH v3 " Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 23:28     ` Marek Vasut
2013-03-06  5:11       ` Shawn Guo
2013-03-06 16:41         ` Marek Vasut
2013-03-06 17:13     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-07  2:33       ` Mark Brown
2013-03-07  9:18         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-07  9:31           ` Mark Brown
2013-03-07 11:20             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-08  7:43               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-03-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ASoC: mxs: move to use generic DMA helper Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] dma: mxs-dma: remove code left from generic DMA binding conversion Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ARM: dts: remove old DMA binding data from client nodes Shawn Guo
2013-03-05 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] ARM: mxs: move to generic DMA device tree binding Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130308074325.GB28481@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).