From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 23:12:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Dove: add RTC device node
In-Reply-To: <20130308215818.GU23237@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <20130308121317.4ee83c0a@armhf>
 <20130308215818.GU23237@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <201303082312.02189.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 08 March 2013, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Applied to mvebu/fixes with the following commit entry:
> 
>     ARM: Dove: add RTC device node
> 
>     The commit:
> 
>       48be9ac ARM: Dove: split legacy and DT setup
> 
>     removed the RTC initialization.  This patch re-enables the RTC
>     via the DT.

Looks good. FWIW, the style I tend to use is


|ARM: Dove: add RTC device node
|
|The commit 48be9ac "ARM: Dove: split legacy and DT setup" removed the RTC
|initialization.  This patch re-enables the RTC via the DT.

I don't think that there is a wide agreement on how to refer to other
patches yet, but I do a lot of regression fixes like that, so maybe I
can start a trend here.

	ARnd