From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:51:46 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] Device Tree fixes for v3.9 In-Reply-To: <201303111443.21019.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201303012319.28231.arnd@arndb.de> <20130302005852.GA3106@gmail.com> <201303111443.21019.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20130311145146.GA11450@zurbaran> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:43:20PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 02 March 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > I'm still getting build errors even with those patches applied: > > > > > > Warning (reg_format): "reg" property in /soc-u9500/prcmu at 80157000/ab8500 at 5 has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 1, #size-cells == 1) > > > Warning (reg_format): "reg" property in /soc-u9500/prcmu at 80157000/ab8500 at 5 has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 1, #size-cells == 1) > > > Warning (reg_format): "reg" property in /soc-u9500/prcmu at 80157000/ab8500 at 5 has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 1, #size-cells == 1) > > > Warning (reg_format): "reg" property in /soc-u9500/prcmu at 80157000/ab8500 at 5 has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 1, #size-cells == 1) > > > > These have been there since DT landed for the AB8500 - it's on my TODO > > to fix, but it's a really low priority. > > I've come up with the trivial patch below. I'm trying hard to kill off all known > warnings, and will not take submissions introducing new ones if I see them. > > Maybe Sam can just pick this up along with the other patch. I'll take it. > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ab8500_power_off': > > > /git/arm-soc/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c:37: undefined reference to `power_supply_get_by_name' > > > /git/arm-soc/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c:53: undefined reference to `power_supply_get_by_name' > > > make[2]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 > > > > This has already been fixed. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2163301/ > > It hasn't made it into v3.9-rc2 or even linux-next yet. I guess it got lost > somewhere. In my Inbox. I'm planning to send a pull request to Linus later this week. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/