From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] ARM: keep __my_cpu_offset consistent with generic one
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:30:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312113048.GS4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVOEvvFT805TJHoppqGRLTRuP18=Wg72LSXryffZD_WH1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:25:28PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks no one objects the patch, so I has submitted it into Russell's
> >> patch system, and hope it can be pushed to linus tree soon and
> >> make LOCK_STAT/DEBUG_LOCKDEP usable on ARMv7.
> >
> > I'm not convinced it is correct. Is the percpu data as stored in the
> > kernel image (in other words, at offset zero) supposed to be read only?
>
> It should have been used after setup_per_cpu_areas().
>
> > If so, the above means that we'll be accessing that rather than the
> > copy of the percpu data we should be accessing.
>
> I admit the patch is a work around for the problem, but it is harmless
> to make lockdep workable on arm at least.
>
> > The percpu data areas are allocated by setup_per_cpu_areas() - that's
> > where we should be initializing this, just like it's done on PowerPC.
>
> >From the entry of start_kernel to setup_per_cpu_areas, there are many
> locks which will be acquired/released, so the percpu variable in lock_release
> has to be used early now. Either disabling lockdep during the period or
> introducing stupid/simple percpu variable inside lockdep may fix the probem,
> but looks both aren't perfect.
>
> So the workaround is proposed in this patch...
>
> Ingo and Peter, what is your opinion on the problem?
Having discussed this with Ben Herrenschmidt, it seems that we do need
to have a more complex patch to sort this out - we need to setup our
private pointer inside setup_per_cpu_areas().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 13:35 [PATCH v1] ARM: keep __my_cpu_offset consistent with generic one Ming Lei
2013-03-12 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-12 10:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-12 11:25 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-12 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-03-12 11:44 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-12 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-13 0:57 ` Ming Lei
2013-04-03 16:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-04 6:31 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130312113048.GS4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).