From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:26:05 +0100 Subject: ARM: at-91: ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 went missing In-Reply-To: <1363173747.3137.202.camel@x61.thuisdomein> References: <1363171688.3137.196.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <51405F0D.40102@atmel.com> <1363173747.3137.202.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Message-ID: <20130313122605.GE2001@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12:22 Wed 13 Mar , Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 12:12 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > These ARCH_AT91xxx variables are not used anymore for pure Device Tree > > SoCs (I mean: at91sam9x5, at91sam9n12, sama5d3 families). They are used > > for non-DT SoCs and for chips that support both legacy board files and DT. > > The old ARCH_AT91xxx symbols are selecting the corresponding SOC_AT91xxx > > symbol. > > > > ARCH_AT91xxx in Kconfig that are specific to a particular SoC are going > > to disappear as we tend to allow the compilation of a particular driver > > for a wider range of configurations. > > So setting one of the SOC_* symbols will not generate the corresponding > ARCH_* symbol, will it? To be specific, for the people entering the > configuration from the new SOC_* side none of this is relevant anymore > (this is all the stuff outside of arch/arm): yes it's as when I prepare the at91 for dt support I split the code in two world. The old style (one soc at a time) and the st multi soc the ARCH_AT91xxx are still here as part of the code are still depending on old style platform data and not converted to DT but the ARCH_AT91SAM9x5 never exist at the mainline and all the old style as now mark as deprecated and for removal Best Regards, J. > > drivers/misc/Kconfig:87: prompt "TC Block" if ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91SAM9260 || CPU_AT32AP700X > drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig:291: depends on PCMCIA && ARCH_AT91RM9200 > drivers/rtc/Kconfig:977: depends on ARCH_AT91 && !(ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91X40) > drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:268:#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200 > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig:127: depends on ARCH_AT91 && !ARCH_AT91RM9200 > drivers/misc/Kconfig:87: prompt "TC Block" if ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91SAM9260 || CPU_AT32AP700X > drivers/video/Kconfig:1026: depends on FB_ATMEL && ARCH_AT91SAM9261 > drivers/net/can/Kconfig:68: depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9263 || ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 > drivers/rtc/Kconfig:991: prompt "RTT module Number" if ARCH_AT91SAM9263 > drivers/rtc/Kconfig:1000: range 0 3 if !ARCH_AT91SAM9263 > drivers/rtc/Kconfig:1001: range 0 15 if ARCH_AT91SAM9263 > drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:157: depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91SAM9RL || ARCH_AT91SAM9G45 > drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c:329:#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9RL) > drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c:349:#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9RL */ > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig:305: depends on MMC_ATMELMCI && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91SAM9G45) && DMA_ENGINE > drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:157: depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91SAM9RL || ARCH_AT91SAM9G45 > drivers/net/can/Kconfig:68: depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9263 || ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 > > > Paul Bolle >