public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: kirkwood: Fix chip-delay for GoFlex Net
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:05:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130318210558.GB31817@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318192653.GZ21478@lunn.ch>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:26:53PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:48:56PM +0100, Eric Hutter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This fixes "Too few good blocks within range" issues on GoFlex Net
> > by setting chip-delay to 40.
> 
> Hi Eric
> 
> Its a problem seen by a couple of other boards as well, e.g. dns320
> and dns325.

The MTD core default of 20us is too small for modern NAND flash.. This
number is based on the chip's datahseet, it should be the longest
non-programming command BUSY interval. Eric, if you haven't already,
it is worth a quick check of the datasheet to verify. Eg the Micron
flash on my Kirkwood system should be 70us.

u-boot can sometimes get away with a smaller value because it only
uses a limited set of commands.

It is on my TODO list to implement ONFI READY/BUSY# pin support in the
orion-nand driver via a GPIO - could other systems make use of this as
well?

Regards,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-18 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-18 18:48 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: kirkwood: Fix chip-delay for GoFlex Net Eric Hutter
2013-03-18 19:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-03-18 21:05   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2013-03-18 19:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-28 16:36 ` Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130318210558.GB31817@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox