From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common clock framework
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:56:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130320025656.11073.90469@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <116a01ce24fd$e32658b0$a9730a10$%kim@samsung.com>
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-03-19 17:00:09)
> Mike Turquette wrote:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > Are you planning a V7 series which includes the clock alias bits from
> > > > patch #1?
> > >
> > > Kukjin has already applied this series into the linux-samsung tree [0].
> > >
> Thanks, Heiko.
>
> Mike, yes I did, as we discussed before. Since I missed in last window for v3.9, so I merged every common clock stuff for exynos into samsung tree in the early 3.9-rc time for v3.10.
> >
> > That really is too much code to go into drivers/clk without my ACK. I
> > have not made much noise about this in the past but there has been more
> > and more "bonus" code slipping into drivers/clk each merge window.
> > Let's not do that any more.
> >
>
> Hmm, I remember you already agreed on previous version, and I thought if any further codes are required, we could do it on top of that.
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/143429.html
>
In the email you linked to my use of the word "merged" did not imply an
ACK. I was asking about merging the two separate exynos4 and exynos5
ccf development efforts together.
Furthermore if I *had* agreed on the previous version it would still
have been appropriate to put my Acked-by on those patches, which is
clearly missing today.
> However, if you don't want current codes to be sent to upstream, let me know, but I don't think it would be better to us though.
No, I am not asking you to revert/drop the patches, but I am using this
as a public example.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 8:21 [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common clock framework Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] clk: samsung: add common clock framework helper functions for Samsung platforms Thomas Abraham
2013-03-03 1:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-03-03 11:17 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-03 11:45 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-03-03 12:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-03-03 12:48 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-07 1:44 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-09 9:15 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-03 11:59 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-03 12:34 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] clk: samsung: add pll clock registration helper functions Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] clk: exynos4: register clocks using common clock framework Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] clk: exynos5250: " Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] clk: exynos5440: " Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] ARM: Exynos: Initialize the clocks prior to timer initialization Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:32 ` Kyungmin Park
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] ARM: Exynos4: allow legacy board support to specify xxti and xusbxti clock speed Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] ARM: Exynos: remove auxdata table from exynos4/5 dt machine file Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] clocksource: mct: use fin_pll clock as the tick clock source for mct Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] clocksource: mct: add support for mct clock setup Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] ARM: dts: add Exynos4 and Exynos5 clock controller nodes Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] ARM: dts: add clock provider information for all controllers in Exynos4 SoCs Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] ARM: dts: add clock provider information for all controllers in Exynos5250 SoC Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] ARM: dts: add clock provider information for all controllers in Exynos5440 SoC Thomas Abraham
2013-02-18 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] ARM: dts: add board specific fixed rate clock nodes for Exynos based platforms Thomas Abraham
2013-02-19 5:11 ` Olof Johansson
2013-03-19 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common clock framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-19 21:12 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-03-19 21:50 ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-20 0:00 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-20 2:56 ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2013-03-20 4:50 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-20 14:40 ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-21 23:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-03-22 14:27 ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-25 1:05 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130320025656.11073.90469@quantum \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox