From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:27:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common
 clock framework
In-Reply-To: <14d801ce268b$80a8d160$81fa7420$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <1361175686-19400-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
 <20130319184938.8663.18115@quantum> <201303192212.16877.heiko@sntech.de>
 <20130319215038.8663.83548@quantum>
 <116a01ce24fd$e32658b0$a9730a10$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20130320025656.11073.90469@quantum>
 <11af01ce2526$63b0a8f0$2b11fad0$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20130320144000.11073.37741@quantum>
 <14d801ce268b$80a8d160$81fa7420$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20130322142739.834.2721@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-03-21 16:26:24)
> Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > >
> > > > Furthermore if I *had* agreed on the previous version it would still
> > > > have been appropriate to put my Acked-by on those patches, which is
> > > > clearly missing today.
> > > >
> > > BTW, how about following?
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg210266.html
> > >
> > > In my understanding, it should be your agreement, it cannot be 'ack' though.
> > >
> > 
> > I had forgotten about that email from November.  Still my ack should
> > have been added.  If necessary I'll be painfully explicit in the future
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > about adding my acked-by.  It's a simple and good rule to follow.
> > 
> Yeah, I know. So if you want to add your ack on drivers/clk stuff for this series in samsung tree, please let me know.
> 

The patches are in pretty good shape.  Please add my ack if you are able
to rebase comfortably.  But if rebasing causes you and your downstream
users a lot of pain then don't do it.

Regards,
Mike

> Thanks, Mike.
> 
> - Kukjin