From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mvebu: Device bus driver resurrection
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:05:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326140525.0167bd72@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130326124337.GD2454@localhost>
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:43:38 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Now that we've all agreed on a mvebu mbus driver (or a first version of it)
> I'd like to resurrect the Device Bus driver.
>
> As far as I can remember, the last things said about this driver were:
>
> * The timing parameters should be in {nano,pico,etc} seconds,
> instead of ticks.
>
> * Although not everyone agreed, this driver was a good thing to have
> so we no longer depend on the bootloader setting these parameters.
>
> * The address decoding windows should *not* be setup by this driver,
> but rather be described in the device tree itself.
>
> If anyone has aditional comments, please speak your mind.
>
> My plan is to address all of the above comments, and send a v2 soon.
>
> However, since we do not yet describe the address windows at the device tree,
> the plan is to do window allocation/release in this devbus driver
> **only as a temporal solution**.
>
> Once the address decoding windows are properly described in the DTS,
> we can remove that handling from the driver for good.
>
> Does this sound sane enough?
Of course I do agree with your proposal, and I'd like to say that I'm
committed to work on a proper DT binding for the mvebu-mbus driver so
that the static windows can ultimately be defined in the Device Tree.
So what Ezequiel presents here as a temporary solution really is.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 12:43 mvebu: Device bus driver resurrection Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-26 13:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-03-26 16:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-03-26 16:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-05 21:26 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130326140525.0167bd72@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox