From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local TLB ops
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:34:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327103429.GB801@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364235581-17900-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:19:38PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> @@ -352,22 +369,33 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> dsb();
>
> if (possible_tlb_flags & (TLB_V3_FULL|TLB_V4_U_FULL|TLB_V4_D_FULL|TLB_V4_I_FULL)) {
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(get_cpu(), mm_cpumask(mm))) {
> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm))) {
> tlb_op(TLB_V3_FULL, "c6, c0, 0", zero);
> tlb_op(TLB_V4_U_FULL, "c8, c7, 0", zero);
> tlb_op(TLB_V4_D_FULL, "c8, c6, 0", zero);
> tlb_op(TLB_V4_I_FULL, "c8, c5, 0", zero);
> }
> - put_cpu();
Why is this change needed? You only flush the local TLB if the mm never
wasn't active on this processor?
> @@ -398,6 +426,21 @@ local_flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long uaddr)
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_U_PAGE, "c8, c7, 1", uaddr);
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_D_PAGE, "c8, c6, 1", uaddr);
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_I_PAGE, "c8, c5, 1", uaddr);
> +
> + if (tlb_flag(TLB_BARRIER))
> + dsb();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +__flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long uaddr)
> +{
> + const unsigned int __tlb_flag = __cpu_tlb_flags;
> +
> + uaddr = (uaddr & PAGE_MASK) | ASID(vma->vm_mm);
> +
> + if (tlb_flag(TLB_WB))
> + dsb();
> +
I guess here we could just have a single *_tlb_page() variant. I
couldn't find any place where we call the local_flush_tlb_page()
explicitly, I guess we don't really need local semantics. On ARMv6 SMP,
they are local anyway.
If we have a single *_tlb_page() function, you would need to drop the
TLB_V6_*_PAGE from the v8 possible TLB ops.
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_720789
> tlb_op(TLB_V7_UIS_PAGE, "c8, c3, 3", uaddr & PAGE_MASK);
> #else
> @@ -428,6 +471,22 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_kernel_page(unsigned long kaddr)
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_U_PAGE, "c8, c7, 1", kaddr);
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_D_PAGE, "c8, c6, 1", kaddr);
> tlb_op(TLB_V6_I_PAGE, "c8, c5, 1", kaddr);
> +
> + if (tlb_flag(TLB_BARRIER)) {
> + dsb();
> + isb();
> + }
> +}
I have some worries with this function. It is used by set_top_pte() and
it really doesn't look like it has local-only semantics. For example,
you use it do flush the I-cache aliases and this must target all the
CPUs because of speculative prefetches, which means that set_top_pte()
must set the new alias on all the CPUs.
Highmem mappings need to be revisited as well.
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/context.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,7 @@ static void flush_context(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> /* Queue a TLB invalidate and flush the I-cache if necessary. */
> - if (!tlb_ops_need_broadcast())
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &tlb_flush_pending);
> - else
> - cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);
> + cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);
That's a good change ;)
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 18:19 [PATCH 0/4] TLB and mm-related optimisations Will Deacon
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local TLB ops Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:34 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-03-27 12:07 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 12:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 13:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local BP ops Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mm: kill unused TLB_CAN_READ_FROM_L1_CACHE and use ALT_SMP instead Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 13:18 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 13:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 13:54 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 14:06 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 14:46 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 15:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 15:36 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 15:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 16:29 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 16:48 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 17:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: atomics: don't use exclusives for atomic64 read/set with LPAE Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327103429.GB801@MacBook-Pro.local \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).