linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local TLB ops
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:34:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327103429.GB801@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364235581-17900-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:19:38PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> @@ -352,22 +369,33 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		dsb();
>  
>  	if (possible_tlb_flags & (TLB_V3_FULL|TLB_V4_U_FULL|TLB_V4_D_FULL|TLB_V4_I_FULL)) {
> -		if (cpumask_test_cpu(get_cpu(), mm_cpumask(mm))) {
> +		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm))) {
>  			tlb_op(TLB_V3_FULL, "c6, c0, 0", zero);
>  			tlb_op(TLB_V4_U_FULL, "c8, c7, 0", zero);
>  			tlb_op(TLB_V4_D_FULL, "c8, c6, 0", zero);
>  			tlb_op(TLB_V4_I_FULL, "c8, c5, 0", zero);
>  		}
> -		put_cpu();

Why is this change needed? You only flush the local TLB if the mm never
wasn't active on this processor?

> @@ -398,6 +426,21 @@ local_flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long uaddr)
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_U_PAGE, "c8, c7, 1", uaddr);
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_D_PAGE, "c8, c6, 1", uaddr);
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_I_PAGE, "c8, c5, 1", uaddr);
> +
> +	if (tlb_flag(TLB_BARRIER))
> +		dsb();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +__flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long uaddr)
> +{
> +	const unsigned int __tlb_flag = __cpu_tlb_flags;
> +
> +	uaddr = (uaddr & PAGE_MASK) | ASID(vma->vm_mm);
> +
> +	if (tlb_flag(TLB_WB))
> +		dsb();
> +

I guess here we could just have a single *_tlb_page() variant. I
couldn't find any place where we call the local_flush_tlb_page()
explicitly, I guess we don't really need local semantics. On ARMv6 SMP,
they are local anyway.

If we have a single *_tlb_page() function, you would need to drop the
TLB_V6_*_PAGE from the v8 possible TLB ops.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_720789
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V7_UIS_PAGE, "c8, c3, 3", uaddr & PAGE_MASK);
>  #else
> @@ -428,6 +471,22 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_kernel_page(unsigned long kaddr)
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_U_PAGE, "c8, c7, 1", kaddr);
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_D_PAGE, "c8, c6, 1", kaddr);
>  	tlb_op(TLB_V6_I_PAGE, "c8, c5, 1", kaddr);
> +
> +	if (tlb_flag(TLB_BARRIER)) {
> +		dsb();
> +		isb();
> +	}
> +}

I have some worries with this function. It is used by set_top_pte() and
it really doesn't look like it has local-only semantics. For example,
you use it do flush the I-cache aliases and this must target all the
CPUs because of speculative prefetches, which means that set_top_pte()
must set the new alias on all the CPUs.

Highmem mappings need to be revisited as well.

> --- a/arch/arm/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/context.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,7 @@ static void flush_context(unsigned int cpu)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Queue a TLB invalidate and flush the I-cache if necessary. */
> -	if (!tlb_ops_need_broadcast())
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &tlb_flush_pending);
> -	else
> -		cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);
> +	cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);

That's a good change ;)

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-27 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-25 18:19 [PATCH 0/4] TLB and mm-related optimisations Will Deacon
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local TLB ops Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:34   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-03-27 12:07     ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 12:30       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 12:56         ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 13:40           ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 13:54             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: tlb: don't perform inner-shareable invalidation for local BP ops Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mm: kill unused TLB_CAN_READ_FROM_L1_CACHE and use ALT_SMP instead Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 12:20     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 13:18   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 13:41     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 13:54       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 14:06         ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 14:46           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 15:04             ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 15:36               ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 15:41                 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 16:29                   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-05-15 16:48                     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-15 17:16                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: atomics: don't use exclusives for atomic64 read/set with LPAE Will Deacon
2013-03-27 10:57   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130327103429.GB801@MacBook-Pro.local \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).