From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:09:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: cacheflush: don't bother rounding to nearest vma In-Reply-To: <1364235486-17738-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1364235486-17738-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <1364235486-17738-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> Message-ID: <20130327110938.GG801@MacBook-Pro.local> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:18:05PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > do_cache_op finds the lowest VMA contained in the specified address > range and rounds the range to cover only the mapped addresses. > > Since commit 4542b6a0fa6b ("ARM: 7365/1: drop unused parameter from > flush_cache_user_range") the VMA is not used for anything else in this > code and seeing as the low-level cache flushing routines return -EFAULT > if the address is not valid, there is no need for this range truncation. > > This patch removes the VMA handling code from the cacheflushing syscall. > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > --- > arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 17 +---------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c > index 1c08911..da5e268 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c > @@ -509,25 +509,10 @@ static int bad_syscall(int n, struct pt_regs *regs) > static inline int > do_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags) > { > - struct mm_struct *mm = current->active_mm; > - struct vm_area_struct *vma; > - > if (end < start || flags) > return -EINVAL; > > - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > - vma = find_vma(mm, start); > - if (vma && vma->vm_start < end) { > - if (start < vma->vm_start) > - start = vma->vm_start; > - if (end > vma->vm_end) > - end = vma->vm_end; > - > - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > - return flush_cache_user_range(start, end); > - } > - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > - return -EINVAL; > + return flush_cache_user_range(start, end); While this would work, it introduces a possibility of DoS where an application passes bigger valid range (kernel linear mapping) and the kernel code would not be preempted (CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled). IIRC, that's why Russell reject such patch a while back. -- Catalin