From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Use common scratchpad SAR RAM offsets for all architectures
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:49:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327204930.GM10155@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51535B66.60307@ti.com>
* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [130327 13:52]:
> On Thursday 28 March 2013 12:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> >
> >> From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> >>
> >> Simplifies code and also allows the re-use as is on OMAP5 devices.
> >
> > nit: changelog here is rather weak. It claims "simplifies code" but
> > it's not obvious from the patch how changing a few #defines does that.
> >
> I agree. Basically the offset are chosen such a way that they can
> work on OMAP4 and OMAP5 instead of having two separate sets.
> Will expand the changelog to make it clear.
You might want to mention also that the offsets are only used by
the kernel to save and restore registers from so people don't
think those are hardare registers and that the patch might break
some things.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 15:18 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: OMAP: Static deps, fiq, omap-smp cleanup Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Use common scratchpad SAR RAM offsets for all architectures Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 20:49 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 20:49 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-03-27 20:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 7:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: OMAP1: PM: Remove bogus fiq_[enable/disable] tuple Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 16:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-20 16:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: OMAP2+: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 19:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 7:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Remove the un-necessary cache flush from hotplug code Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 20:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 7:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Remove un-necessary cacheflush in secondary CPU boot path Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Remove out of placed smp_wmb() in secondary wakeup code Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-21 12:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-21 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Move the CPU wakeup prepare code under smp_prepare_cpus() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 19:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 20:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 7:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28 9:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 12:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28 12:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Remove L4 wakeup depedency with MPU since errata fix exist now Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-27 19:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-20 15:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Now remove L4 per clockdomain static depedency with MPU Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-27 18:46 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327204930.GM10155@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).