From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:05:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround In-Reply-To: <20130327205606.GN10155@atomide.com> References: <517283541.62064.1362124023621.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg> <201303241526.59275@pali> <20130327205606.GN10155@atomide.com> Message-ID: <201303272205.17182@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Roh?r [130324 07:31]: > > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for > > RX-51? > > I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for > ARM. > > AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various > implementations. So the handler and passing of the parameters > seems like it should be generic. > Not only, look at freemangordon's email: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/1/62 > Regards, > > Tony -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: