From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:24:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: update V-INTCORE constraints In-Reply-To: <20130402084446.GA6850@balto.lan> References: <1364397694-14126-1-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> <20130402083829.GB23065@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130402084446.GA6850@balto.lan> Message-ID: <20130402092446.GB4375@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > > I know that Lee's been sending off a large set of regulator patches > > > lately, some include alterations to this platform config. > > > > > Maybe it's better to take this patch into the regulator tree if these > > > machine configs will come in that way? Also like Lee to have a > > > look at this... > > > > If it's touching the board constraints it's likely to have conflicts > > with Lee's stuff, yes. > > Lee's patches are on -next Not all of them are on -next, but all are on the MLs. I'm currently fixing up some of Mark's review comments in order to re-submit the remainder. > and should not conflict with this one > (tested again on today's tree), but it may be nice anyway to have this > in the regulator framework with the others. > Mark, would you consider taking this one in your tree? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog