linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] AB8500 Power and MFD related updates
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:46:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130408094621.GN24058@zurbaran> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408093303.GF3084@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8:
> > > 
> > >   Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800)
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-mfd-and-power
> > I was expecting to get an MFD only branch (Basically what your for-mfd branch
> > looks like, and then the for-mfd-and-power one to be based on the mfd only
> > with the power patches applied on top of it.
> > Now, I have to pull the power patches as well, which is no big deal but not
> > ideal neither.
> 
> Sorry Sam, I guess I understood you differently:
> 
> "I can Ack the MFD parts, they look good to me. And then you can take
> the whole thing through your tree, but I'd prefer you to do so by
> pulling the branch Lee prepared for us. I want to avoid conflicts this
> way."
I realize this was not very clear from me, sorry.
I meant I'm fine with Anton taking the whole thing, but by pulling from what
is your current for-mfd-and-power branch. Anton did that and that's all good.
Now, to prevent being flamed to death by Linus, I need to carry the MFD
patches from this branch as well, and that should have come from a common
for-mfd branch.
Basically, what I had in mind:

- You create a for-mfd branch with all the MFD patches need for the
  power patches to be applied properly.
- You create a for-mfd-and-power branch, where you first merge your for-mfd
  branch and then apply the power patches.
- Anton pulls from for-mfd-and-power.
- I pull from for-mfd.
- Anton and me carry the exact same set of MFD patches and regardless of who
  Linus pulls from first, it should work fine.

That should still work from your for-mfd-and-power branch, just slightly
less clean imo, as I will carry power patches I really don't need.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-07  4:38 [GIT PULL] AB8500 Power and MFD related updates Lee Jones
2013-03-19  2:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-04-08  9:18 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-04-08  9:33   ` Lee Jones
2013-04-08  9:46     ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130408094621.GN24058@zurbaran \
    --to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).