From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:40:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: sunxi: Unify oscillator clock
In-Reply-To: <5165FEB9.9080906@elopez.com.ar>
References: <1365515284-32061-2-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar>
 <1365631378-16103-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org>
 <1365631378-16103-4-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org>
 <5165FEB9.9080906@elopez.com.ar>
Message-ID: <20130412184037.6507.31234@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Emilio L?pez (2013-04-10 17:07:21)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> El 10/04/13 19:02, Mike Turquette escribi?:
> > From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > 
> > This commit uses the new fixed-rate support on the composite clock to
> > unify osc24M_fixed and osc24M clocks, so it matches the actual hardware.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > [mturquette at linaro.org: replace clk_register_gatable_osc with a call to
> > clk_register_composite]
> > ---
> > Emilio,
> > 
> > I haven't been able to test these changes at run-time.  Can you see if
> > they are valid for solving your issue on sunxi?
> 
> I tested the three patches you sent + 3/3 from the original series which
> is the DT part.
> 
> $ git log --oneline -n 4
> b63f51e ARM: sunxi: unify osc24M_fixed and osc24M
> 7f86473 clk: sunxi: Unify oscillator clock
> 78c8aaf clk: composite: allow fixed rates & fixed dividers
> 2d52a44 clk: composite: rename 'div' references to 'rate'
> 
> It seems to be working fine as far as I can tell, so
> 
> Tested-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
> 

I've applied all three patches to clk-next.  I assume the DT patch will
go through Maxime's tree.

Regards,
Mike

> Thanks,
> 
> Emilio