From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew.murray@arm.com (Andrew Murray) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:59:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 0/3] of/pci: Provide common support for PCI DT parsing In-Reply-To: <20130416113727.GA28693@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1365693969-23907-1-git-send-email-Andrew.Murray@arm.com> <20130415175641.GM28693@titan.lakedaemon.net> <1366096361.24994.49.camel@pasglop> <20130416112951.GZ28693@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20130416133140.7de24c89@skate> <20130416113727.GA28693@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20130416115929.GB13259@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:37:27PM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Dear Jason Cooper, > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:29:51 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > > Do not send this series upstream (or even in -next) until it has been at > > > > least build-tested and acked by the affected architectures. AFAIK it > > > > breaks microblaze build (simple missing #include) and isn't yet tested > > > > on powerpc (I'm on vacation, maybe somebody else on linuxppc-dev can do > > > > it though). > > > > > > I added the missing include reference by Michal Simek for the branch at > > > mvebu/drivers. > > > > Some other build issues were reported on x86 during the night (thanks > > to automated build tests), and Andrew Murray has just sent a new > > version v7 of the patch set addressing those issues, as well as the > > missing include. > > > > Also, please note that Andrew's patch set contains three patches, but > > the Marvell PCIe driver only requires PATCH 1/3 and PATCH 2/3. > > Ok. Thanks Andrew! Do you (AndrewM) want me to keep the series > together? Or drop 3/3 from my tree? I can do either, I just need to > know. Patch 1 has an ack from Microblaze but not yet from PowerPC, it probably needs an ack from both of these before moving upwards. Patch 3 is awaiting feedback from Mips, ideally all three patches could stay together but if feedback blocks this then I guess it could go alone later. Andrew Murray