From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:12:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V4 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: added support for polling mode In-Reply-To: References: <1366015230-18243-1-git-send-email-ks.giri@samsung.com> <20130416112035.GD26958@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20130416121255.GA15878@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:58:47PM +0530, Girish KS wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm missing patch 1 of this series. > its already merged to stable tree after your review The patch numbering should reflect what you're posting. If you're only sending four patches they should be numbered 1-4, otherwise it looks like there's something missing. The goal with the numbers is to help people get the patches in the right order, the name should be enough to associate with other versions of the same patch.