From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:58:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 RESEND 3/5] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for non-gpio i/o's In-Reply-To: <1366015230-18243-2-git-send-email-ks.giri@samsung.com> References: <1366015230-18243-1-git-send-email-ks.giri@samsung.com> <1366015230-18243-2-git-send-email-ks.giri@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20130416155850.GL26958@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:10:28PM +0530, Girish K S wrote: > From: Girish K S > > Currently the drivers supports only the GPIO based i/o pins. > But there are Exynos SoC's that use the same controller with > dedicated i/o pins. > > This patch provides provision to support gpio/dedicated pins. > The decision is made by parsing the "gpios" property in the spi > node. This has some conflicts with my SPI -next branch, I think it's all due to Arnd's changes to support multi-platform boot on Exynos but there may be some other stuff. Can you please rebase against git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git spi-next and make sure everything is OK? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: