[PATCH v7 1/3] of/pci: Unify pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges from Microblaze and PowerPC

[grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)]

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:30:06 +0100, Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > The pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges function, used to parse the "ranges"
> > property of a PCI host device, is found in both Microblaze and PowerPC
> > architectures. These implementations are nearly identical. This patch
> > moves this common code to a common place.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> > Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> > ---
> >  arch/microblaze/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |    5 +-
> >  arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c         |  192 ----------------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h    |    5 +-
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c         |  192 ----------------------------
> 
> Is there anyone on linuxppc-dev/linux-mips that can help test this patchset?
> 
> I've tested that it builds on powerpc with a variety of configs (some which
> include fsl_pci.c implementation). Though I don't have hardware to verify that
> it works.
> 
> I haven't tested this builds or runs on MIPS.
> 
> You shouldn't see any difference in behaviour or new warnings and PCI devices
> should continue to operate as before.

I've got through a line-by-line comparison between powerpc, microblaze,
and then new code. The differences are purely cosmetic, so I have
absolutely no concerns about this patch. I've applied it to my tree.

g.